What Is the Chemical Composition of Blood

Blood is slightly denser and is approximately three to four times more viscous than water. Blood consists of cells that are suspended in a liquid. As with other suspensions, the components of blood can be separated by filtration. However, the most common method of separating blood is to centrifuge (spin) it. Three layers are visible in centrifuged blood. The straw-colored liquid portion, called plasma, forms at the top (~55%). The buffy coat, a thin cream-colored layer consisting of white blood cells and platelets forms below the plasma, while red blood cells comprise the heavy bottom portion of the separated mixture (~45%). What Is the Volume of Blood? Blood volume is variable but tends to be about 8% of body weight. Factors such as body size, the amount of adipose tissue, and electrolyte concentrations all affect blood volume. The average adult has about 5 liters of blood. What Is the Composition of Blood? Blood consists of cellular material (99% red blood cells, with white blood cells and platelets making up the remainder), water, amino acids, proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, hormones, vitamins, electrolytes, dissolved gasses, and cellular wastes. Each red blood cell is about one-third hemoglobin, by volume. Plasma is about 92% water, with plasma proteins as the most abundant solutes. The main plasma protein groups are albumins, globulins, and fibrinogens. The primary blood gasses are oxygen, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen. Sources Holes Human Anatomy Physiology, 9th Edition, McGraw Hill, 2002.

Frankenstein Vensor Frankenstein And The Modern Prometheus...

Titan or Theif In Greek Mythology, there is a tale where a Titan named Prometheus stole fire from the gods and put it in the clay to make man. Like in the Greek Mythology, Mary Shelley has Victor Frankenstein steal life from nature. As Mary Shelley states in the title of her book Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, she parallels Victor Frankenstein to the Titan Prometheus. As Mary Shelley states in Frankenstein the pursuit of unknown knowledge is dangerous. â€Å" So much has been done†¦ I will pioneer a new way, explain unknown powers, and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation( Chapter 3). †. This quote means that Victor wants to explore dangerous areas that should not be explored. Dangerous and unknown knowledge†¦show more content†¦Prometheus punishment for stealing fire from the Greeks Gods was an eternal hell where a bird will rip out his liver daily for eternity. For Victor Frankenstein, his punishment was similar to Prometheus’s. For Victor Frankenstein, his punishment was similar to Prometheus’s. He too suffered daily as a reminder of what he did. Victor Frankenstein’s punishment is also similar to Prometheus because he too has something ripped away from him. Prometheus had his liver ripped away and Victor Frankenstein had his love ones taken away from him. Both Prometheus and Victor Frankenstein suffer by â€Å" playing God,†. Prometheus crafts man while Victor crafts the daemon. In Paradise Lost by John Milton, Satan and his legion of followers were cast out of Heaven and put into Hell. Satan was cast out because he challenged the authority of God. Like Victor Frankenstein and Prometheus the Titan, Satan did something that caused him to lose his title. Victor Frankenstein was a smart young man that had a lot of promise and potential. He lost all of it because he tampered with nature’s authority. Prometheus was a powerful Titan that stole the right to make life from Zeus; he t oo stole the power from a higher authority. All three characters, Satan, Prometheus, and Victor, ended up in their own personal Hell. For Satan, he was thrown out of Heaven and was chained to the burning lake in Hell. Prometheus’s

Human Resource Management Psychology and Policing

Question: Discuss about the Human Resource Management for Psychology and Policing. Answer: Introduction: Business use performance appraisal as effective tool for determining how effective employees aim at achieving goals as well as job scope and communicating with others. However, at the same time, if not done right, it can create a negative experience (Pichler, 2012). Performance appraisal considered time-consuming as well as overwhelming to managers with many employees. This particular tool assessment is based on human aspect as well as subject to rater errors and biasness. If not performed adequately, it will be a waste of time and energy by the managers and supervisors (Espinilla et al., 2013). At the same time, it can create stressful environment for employees working in a business organization. Managers mostly bring their own biasness as well as subjective notions at the time of appraisal process for attainment of organizational goal. Bias often skews the results in precise peer review based appraisal schemes as well as causing employees loss of faith in the system. Traditional performance review tools takes into consideration only the manager view regarding the performance of their subordinates. If a particular manager supervises given direct reports and response to own supervisor, then the manager will have limited amount of time for observing employee in action for overcoming problems (Bernardin Wiatrowski, 2013). Most of the companies overcome this disadvantage by employing peer appraisal based assessment tools for intriguing into account for maintaining working relations. It is argued that companies uses performance appraisal as individual tool and this act as risk of added conflicts between subordinates as well as supervision. This erodes employee motivation and renders negative impact on performance appraisal system leading to organizational goal (Aggarwal Thakur, 2013). Managers should take into consideration all the drawbacks resulting from performance appraisal tools and find other innovative way to motivate employees for working more in the business organization. Halo effect is one of the disadvantages of performance appraisal whereby superior appraises the person based on certain positive qualities. In this, negative personality traits are not taken into consideration (Bernardin Wiatrowski, 2013). By explaining the above meaning, it reveals that this type of appraisal fails to give true picture regarding any employee working in an organization. In some cases, it may happen that non-deserving employees gets promotions easily. Horn effect is other drawback whereby only negative qualities of the employees are taken into consideration as well as based on appraisal. This appraisal system fails because appraisal may not present a true picture regarding employees working in an organization. Central Tendency means superior giving an appraisal by central values. In other words, this prevents real talented employees for getting promotions what they actually deserve. Sometimes, it happens that bosses are lenient in grading employees and leads to biasness of results (Espinilla et al., 2013). On the contrary, some bosses are even strict by nature. By this action, deserving employees will not be getting the opportunity that they actually deserve. In case of spillover effect, the ultimate boss based on past performance judges employees. It may happen that employee improves over level of performance but does not get special benefit. Reference List Aggarwal, A., Thakur, G. S. M. (2013). Techniques of performance appraisal-a review. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN, 2249-8958. Bernardin, H. J., Wiatrowski, M. (2013). Performance appraisal. Psychology and Policing, 257. Espinilla, M., de Andrs, R., Martnez, F. J., Martnez, L. (2013). A 360-degree performance appraisal model dealing with heterogeneous information and dependent criteria. Information Sciences, 222, 459-471. Pichler, S. (2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta?analysis. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 709-732.

Identifications of Social Movements-Free-Samples for Students

Question: In what sense do Social Movements Enhance Democratic Practice and in what sense do they stray from it? Answer: Introduction The social movement has been struggling for democracy and they have broadened the scope for deliberative as well as participatory democracy. The progressive democracy has contributed to various levels of internal decision-making, which in turn helps in the consensus building[1]. This essay would identify the different social movements that improve democratic practice or hamper the democratic practice. Discussion The social movements in various parts of the world have increasingly proved to be one of the prime factors for mobilizing the resources of the nation and implementation of the various measures within a neoliberal economic approach[2]. The social movements are an excellent platform in which the people are in a position to know each other as well as the public activities that are taking place in the society. This kind of society can be successful as a self-governance in the matters of political campaigns, representation and the various elections. A well connected network of countrys citizens is instrumental in making a robust democratic government. Such social networks are capable of introducing social capital in the systems, which are responsible for responsive representatives, better civic amenities, healthy populations, effective governance and more engaged citizens[3]. The social movements bring in the community mobilization, which also connects the isolated communities as well. Th e overlapping consensus of the people with different moral as well as religious outlook would lead them to the common institutions of the liberal and just society. The social movements enforce overlapping consensus which is based on the values as well as interests that successfully avoid the various religious-political scenario[4]. The social movements are synonymous with the sustainable as well as collective approach, which is eventually better for the entire society. This kind of mass movements create popular participation since they have created more widespread network of people. There have been witnesses in history that shows that the social movements are capable of performing a greater role in the public framework of decision-making. This has happened through the processes of mechanism and culture of the interaction of the people. This kind of engagement of the community makes the democratic government more efficient since there is more number of entities involved in the decision-making process of the government. This kind of movements is helpful in sharpening the actual consciousness of the citizens, so that they can participate in the democratic processes in a better way. Social movements, can thus, help in pressing the governments for reorganizing their decision-making process and reorganization of the community institutions for the better. The social movements are also capable of straying from democracy and affect the process ultimately[5]. There are incidences in history that show that the social movements have led to problems, that has ultimately affected the democracy process. There have been revolutionary as well as rebellion movements in which the social transformation is being challenged. In such social movements, people are mobilized so that they can resist changes which arise from the oppressed sections residing in the society. There are incidences of mob violence that has devastated fairly strong democratic systems. There have been social movements in which there is lack of clarity of the ideology and its purpose of implementation. This may lead to counter-production and can be violent also, if they are not channelized properly. These kind of social movements are responsible for growing failure as well as lack of interest in resolving the social demands of today. The social movements are also known to create crippling differences, detachment and disenchantment among the local communities. The social unrest as well as mobilizations helped in deterioration of the institutional, political and legal situations of the country. These kinds of mobilizations often lead to a destabilized economy, which often weakens the power of the nation. There are often issues with the participation channels which bind together various states, local and federal governments of the country. This often leads to an improper democratic system. Conclusion The social transformations are important for determinants of the national success. The social transformation can act as a constructive factor for the democracy of a country and also have the potential for destruction of the social capital of the nation. This essay discussed some of the major impacts of social movements on the democracy of a nation. References Choi-Fitzpatrick A, 'Managing Democracy In Social Movement Organizations' (2014) 14 Social Movement Studies Hayes G, 'Social Movement Studies,Social Movement Studies, And The Challenges Of Parochialism: A Rejoinder To Poulson, Caswell And Gray' (2014) 13 Social Movement Studies Johnson V, 'Disintegrating Democracy At Work: Labor Unions And The Future Of Good Jobs In The Service Economy' (2015) 15 Social Movement Studies Refle J, 'What Is A Social Movement?' (2015) 15 Social Movement Studies Weisskircher M, 'The Consequences Of Social Movements' (2016) 16 Social Movement Studies Choi-Fitzpatrick A, 'Managing Democracy In Social Movement Organizations' (2014) 14 Social Movement Studies Hayes G, 'Social Movement Studies,Social Movement Studies, And The Challenges Of Parochialism: A Rejoinder To Poulson, Caswell And Gray' (2014) 13 Social Movement Studies Johnson V, 'Disintegrating Democracy At Work: Labor Unions And The Future Of Good Jobs In The Service Economy' (2015) 15 Social Movement Studies Refle J, 'What Is A Social Movement?' (2015) 15 Social Movement Studies Weisskircher M, 'The Consequences Of Social Movements' (2016) 16 Social Movement Studies